Reacher is 3. 5 years old and still in the Army. He's won a medal only to discover he's being sent back to . Reacher doesn't care. But he's got a job to do and to get it done fast, he'll need Frances Neagley's help. Based on the 1. 8th Reacher. NEVER GO BACK, the movie stars Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher, Cobie Smulders as Susan Turner, Robert Knepper as General Harkness plus. Aldis Hodge, Danika Yarosh, Holt Mc. Callany, with Patrick Heusinger as . But the locals take one look at him and think. What's that saying about not looking for trouble because it may find you? Tom Cruise returns in Jack Reacher: Never Go Back. Watch the trailer now on the official movie site! In theatres October 21, 2016. Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more. Jack Reacher must uncover the truth behind a major government conspiracy in order to clear his name. On the run as a fugitive from the law, Reacher uncovers a. They should have heeded it. Jack Reacher: Never Go Back is the 2016 sequel to 2012's Jack Reacher and is an adaptation of the novel Never Go Back by Lee Child. Tom Cruise returns as Reacher, who. Never Go Back (with bonus novella High Heat) and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Jack Reacher is apprehended in View the latest 'Jack Reacher: Never Go Back' (2016) Trailer - Movie movie trailers, clips, sneak peeks, exclusive videos, and teasers at Moviefone. Jack Reacher : Never Go Back SPOT VOST 'Rules #22 - Toujours JACK REACHER: NEVER GO BACK. Coming soon on October 21st! Visit our MOVIES page to watch two trailers, see photos, posters and a video interview to whet your appetite! Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2. I definitely enjoyed it, though I would be remiss to say that I do not remember very much about the first film. I even re- watched the trailer, re- read some of my own impressions on it from a few years ago, and honestly a lot of it doesn't ring a bell. Some scenes here and there do, but I won't be able to draw any real comparisons for anybody. Not remembering it much though, I think it's safe to say you can see this one without seeing the first one if that's what suits you. Any connection that might have been there flew right by me, and everything is plenty coherent without it. Now, if I felt the first film was strong enough despite its flaws, I think I can say the same for this one as well. Jack Reacher: Never Go Back PlotI think the first one was more of Tom Cruise playing a more impenetrable character, whereas you get him only slightly more grounded this time around. There are reasons for his shield to be a bit lowered though, and I thought those aspects of the film worked out great. My two biggest complaints about JR1 was that one of the baddies was unnecessary and the latter half of the film dragged a little. I didn't think JR2 felt drawn out at all, and any . I'll just bite and say that Cruise was my major draw. Without him I'm sure the film would be just fine (and as I said about the first one, I would have almost preferred seeing it without him in a way), but he's a likable action star and is in that last decade of not getting a little more on the senior side of things, so let's enjoy every bit he has to offer until then! Dialogue was hit- and- miss, a few moments were predictable, and direction wasn't the most ambitious.. Will you be alright missing this from your catalog someday? I think you'll be fine; it's good even though it's not the most original thing done. But I liked what was brought to the character (never read the books) and I think that kind of element is perfect for cinema. It worked, and it worked well even as a standalone film. Despite some films in my Blu- ray collection I can easily see this surpassing (I'm looking at you, Paycheck), it does take a little more novelty in the entertainment factor for me to say that it's going to fly on my shelf. I still do recommend it for those willing to give it a shot. You'll like this. The title may pertain to the film's story, though it's certainly not the most fitting, especially for audience members.. Made for an impressive sequel that ultimately struck more interpersonal heartstrings than less. By the time the credits rolled, I can say that this film should be able to lodge in my memory much better than the first film even if I hypothetically never saw it again. Speaking of which, the end credits music felt a bit out of place and gave me a laugh. Didn't stick around to see if there were any after- credit things, but I don't know if this film franchise would be pushing for that kind of thing anyway.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |